Psychology 621 (a.k.a. lab meeting)
Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory
In this course we emphasize the critical evaluation of topical issues and data in working memory research. Toward this end, we also emphasize the methods of neuroimaging, neuropsychology, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), electroencephalography (EEG), and experimental psychology.
Format: Each week we discuss (at least) one article from the recent literature. These discussions are organized as informal presentations that will give us an opportunity to discuss and assess in detail the theory, methods, results, and interpretation associated with that particular paper. On occasion, these discussions are supplemented with, or supplanted by, an informal presentation of the design and/or results from an experiment being conducted in the Postle laboratory (see section on "3 credits", below). Following the discussion of a particular paper or project, we end the meeting with an attempt to integrate what we've learned from this specific information into the perspective of contemporary cognitive neuroscience inquiry.
Levels of participation: The class may be taken for 1 or 3 credits. The requirements for 1-credit registrants are simply to come to class having read the assigned paper, and prepared to participate in the discussion. The additional requirements for 3-credit registrants are to participate in a research project in the Postle laboratory that entails at least 10 hr./wk. of research time during two consecutive semesters. Availability of 3-credit option depends on current needs of the lab. The course number is Psychology 621. The in-class presentations of 3-crediters typically focus on their own experiments.
- 1-credit: in-class participation
- 3-credit: in-class participation, paper, and research
Meeting time and place: Fridays at 9:55 am in Brogden Psychology Building Room 519
Instructor: Brad Postle, 515 Psychology, 262-4330, email@example.com
Office hours: By appointment.
With the exception of time-sensitive emergencies, email is the most effective and preferred way for you to contact me.
All readings are either available for download from the Lab Meeting tab on the Postlab website, or you may request a hard copy by emailing Jackie Fulvio at firstname.lastname@example.org
Postle BR (2017). Harassment in the academic setting. (View the first 12 minutes or so of the lecture)
Benson, N.C., Kupers, E.R., Barbot, A., Carrasco, M., & Winawer, J. (2021). Cortical magnification in human visual cortex parallels task performance around the visual field. eLife, 10:e67685. https//doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67685
Schurgin, M.W., Wixted, J.T., & Brady, T.F. (2020). Psychophysical scaling reveals a unified theory of visual memory strength. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1156-1172. https://doi.org/10.1038/s441562-020-00938-0
Brascamp, J.W., de Hollander, G., Wertheimer, M.D., DePew, A.N., Knapen, T. (2021). Separable pupillary signatures of perception and action during perceptual multistability. eLife, 10:e66161. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66161
Braver, T.S., Kizhner, A., Tang, R., Freund, M.C., Etzel, J.A. (2021). The Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive Control Project. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(9):1990-2015. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01768
Dorfman, H.M., Tomov, M.S., Cheung, B., Clarke, D., Gershman, S.J., & Hughes, B.L., (2021). Causal Inference Gates Corticostriatal Learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 41(32), 6892-6904. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2796-20.2021
Meyyappan, S., Rajan, A., Mangun, G.R., & Ding, M. (2021). Role of Inferior Frontal Junction (IFJ) in the Control of Feature versus Spatial Attention. Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2883-20.2021
Reddy, L., Self, M.W., Zoefel, B., Poncet, M., Possel, J.K., Peters, J.C., Baayen, J.C., Idema, S., VanRullen, R. & Roelfsema, P.R. (2021). Theta-phase dependent neuronal coding during sequence learning in human single neurons. Nature communications, 12:4839, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25150-0
Freund, M.C., Bugg, J.M., Braver, T.S. (2021). A Representational Similarity Analysis of Cognitive Control during Color-Word Stroop. Journal of Neuroscience, 41(35): 7388-7402. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2956-20.2021
Duecker, K., Gutteling, T.P., Herrmann, C.S., & Jensen, O. (2021). No Evidence for Entrainment: Endogenous Gamma Oscillations and Rhythmic Flicker Responses Coexist in Visual Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 41, 6684-6698. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3134-20.2021
Mostame, P. & Sadaghiani, S. (2021). Oscillation-Based Connectivity Architecture Is Dominated by an Intrinsic Spatial Organization, Not Cognitive State or Frequency. Journal of Neuroscience, 41(1):179-192. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2155-20.2020
King, J.-R. & Wyart, V. (2021). The Human Brain Encodes a Chronicle of Visual Events at Each Instant of Time Through the Multiplexing of Traveling Waves. Journal of Neuroscience, 41(34): 7224-7233. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2098-20.2021
Li, H.-H., Sprague, T.C., Yoo, A.H., Ma, W.J., & Curtis, C.E. (2021). Joint representation of working memory and uncertainty in human visual cortex. Neuron, 109, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.08.022
Where to take complaints about a Teaching Assistant or Course Instructor:
Occasionally, a student may have a complaint about a TA or course instructor. If that happens, you should feel free to discuss the matter directly with the TA or instructor. If the complaint is about the TA and you do not feel comfortable discussing it with him or her, you should discuss it with the course instructor. If you do not want to approach the instructor, make an appointment to speak to the Department Chair, Professor Patricia Devine, by emailing: email@example.com.
If your complaint has to do with sexual harassment, you may also take your complaint to Dan Barnish, Undergraduate Program Coordinator, phone 262-0512 or email him at firstname.lastname@example.org. His office is located on the second floor of the Psychology building, room 223.
If you believe the TA or course instructor has discriminated against you because of your religion, race, gender, sexual orientation, or ethnic background, you also may take your complaint to the Office of Equity and Diversity, room 179-A Bascom Hall, or go to: http://www.oed.wisc.edu/
Ethics of being a student in the Department of Psychology
The members of the faculty of the Department of Psychology at UW-Madison uphold the highest ethical standards of teaching and research. They expect their students to uphold the same standards of ethical conduct. By registering for this course, you are implicitly agreeing to conduct yourself with the utmost integrity throughout the semester.
In the Department of Psychology, acts of academic misconduct are taken very seriously. Such acts diminish the educational experience for all involved – students who commit the acts, classmates who would never consider engaging in such behaviors, and instructors. Academic misconduct includes, but is not limited to, cheating on assignments and exams, stealing exams, sabotaging the work of classmates, submitting fraudulent data, plagiarizing the work of classmates or published and/or online sources, acquiring previously written papers and submitting them (altered or unaltered) for course assignments, collaborating with classmates when such collaboration is not authorized, and assisting fellow students in acts of misconduct. Students who have knowledge that classmates have engaged in academic misconduct should report this to the instructor.
For detailed information on how to avoid plagiarism, please see the following website:http://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/QuotingSources.html
Your instructor will contact you if s/he has concerns about academic misconduct. You will have an opportunity to explain your work and address your instructor’s concerns. Following the meeting, if your instructor believes that you engaged in misconduct, s/he will decide on an action. Following UW protocol, your instructor will inform the Dean of Students’ Office of the outcome of the meeting and proposed sanction. Penalties for substantiated cases of academic misconduct include a zero on the assignment or exam, a lower grade in the course, and failure in the course. Repeated acts of academic misconduct may result in more serious actions such as probation or suspension. For complete information on proper conduct, academic misconduct, and sanctions, please see UWS Chapter 14:http://students.wisc.edu/saja/misconduct/UWS14.html
The University of Wisconsin-Madison supports the right of all enrolled students to a full and equal educational opportunity. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Wisconsin State Statute (36.12), and UW-Madison policy (Faculty Document 1071) require that students with disabilities be reasonably accommodated in instruction and campus life. Reasonable accommodations for students with disabilities is a shared faculty and student responsibility.
Students are expected to inform faculty [me] of their need for instructional accommodations by the end of the third week of the semester, or as soon as possible after a disability has been incurred or recognized. Faculty [I], will work either directly with the student [you] or in coordination with the McBurney Center to identify and provide reasonable instructional accommodations. Disability information, including instructional accommodations, as part of a studentʼs educational record is confidential and protected under FERPA.
In the event that this course is no longer able to meet face-to-face, students should be up to date with course readings and prepared to be evaluated on their knowledge/reading of these materials via email communication with the professor or the lab manager. These readings can be found on the lab website at psych.wisc.edu/postlab under the “Lab Meeting” tab. All questions during any such event should be addressed to the lab manager, Jackie Fulvio (email@example.com). In additions students should monitor the UW-Madison homepage for emergency information and updates.